Title: ADS - Useless parameters passed from PC to LI

PDR Reference:                               	98050005
Originator Reference:                         	ATNSI_ADS02 
SARPs Document Reference:                  	ADS SARPs, Section 
								2.2.1.5.3.10.3.2
Status:                                 		RESOLVED 
Impact :							D (Minor)
PDR Revision Date:                             	17/08/98 (FORWARDED -> RESOLVED)
								25/06/98 (PROPOSED -> FORWARDED)
								20/05/98 (SUBMITTED -> ACCEPTED 
										-> PROPOSED)
PDR Submission Date:                         	12/05/98 
Submitting State/Organization:                	AIRSYS ATM (ACI/ATNSI)
Submitting Author Name:                       	Ilkiewicz, M / Stokes, S
Submitting Author E-mail Address:          											michel.ilkiewicz@cdv.vly.sextant.thomson.fr 						Shawn.Stokes@ATNSI.COM 
Submitting Author Supplemental 
Contact Information:                       
SARPs Date:                                  	IV2.2, March 98 
SARPs Language:                            	English

Summary of Defect:

When the PC module receives an ADS-periodic-contract request in the PC-G-ACTIVE state, it passes the aircraft identifier and the class of communication service parameter values to LI. Both these parameters values are useless.

In a similar situation, the EC module does not pass these parameters values to LI (see section 2.2.1.5.3.8.2.2).

Assigned SME:                              		Sub-Volume II SME

Proposed SARPs amendment: 

- Section 2.2.1.5.3.10.3.2 should be changed from:
"pass it, the aircraft identifier parameter value, and the Class of communication service parameter value, to the ground LI module"

to:
"pass it to the ground LI module"

SME Recommendation to CCB:                 FORWARDED

This editorial change makes the SARPs more accurate. 

CCB Decision:                              		atnp_ccb_chair: SUBMITTED (12/05/98)
					atnp_ccb_chair: ACCEPTED (20/05/98)
					CCB-6 (Utrecht) : FORWARDED (26/06/98)
					atnp_ccb_chair : RESOLVED (17/08/98)(1)

(1) CCB agreed that this PDR should be upgraded to RESOLVED status and should appear as part of the first annual amendment to Doc 9705. FORWARDED status is not appropriate since it indicates a PDR which has been referred to an ATNP WG for addition to its work program, i.e. a enhancement or major change to the baseline.