Title: FIS - Minor defects

PDR Reference:                 	98050013
Originator Reference:           	ATNSI_FIS01 
SARPs Document Reference:        	FIS SARPs, Sections: see below
Status:                         	RESOLVED 
Impact :					D (Minor)
PDR Revision Date:               	17/08/98 (FORWARDED -> RESOLVED)
						25/06/98 (PROPOSED -> FORWARDED)
						20/05/98 (SUBMITTED -> ACCEPTED -> PROPOSED)
PDR Submission Date:            	12/05/98 
Submitting State/Organization:    	AIRSYS ATM (ACI/ATNSI)
Submitting Author Name:          	Ilkiewicz, M / Stokes, S.
Submitting Author E-mail Address:          										michel.ilkiewicz@cdv.vly.sextant.thomson.fr 
				Shawn.Stokes@ATNSI.COM 
Submitting Author Supplemental 
Contact Information:                       
SARPs Date:                    	IV2.2, March 98 
SARPs Language:                 	English

Summary of Defect:

1/ Section 2.4.5.3.9.1 should be changed from:
Upon receipt of a request to abort from the HI, LI, DC or UC modules,
to:
Upon receipt of a request to abort from the HI, LI, DC, UC or CL modules.

2/Section 2.4.5.3.5.7 should be changed from:
Upon receipt of a request from the AB module to stop operation, then
to:
Upon receipt of a request from the AB or CL modules to stop operation, then

3/  Section 2.4.5.3.6.7 should be changed from:
Upon receipt of a request from the AB module to stop operation, then
to:
Upon receipt of a request from the AB or CL modules to stop operation, then

4/ Section 2.4.5.3.7.11 should be changed from:
Upon receipt of a request from the AB module to stop operation, then
to:
Upon receipt of a request from the AB or CL modules to stop operation, then

5/ Section 2.4.5.3.8.10 should be changed from:
Upon receipt of a request from the AB module to stop operation, then
to:
Upon receipt of a request from the AB or CL modules to stop operation, then

Assigned SME:                      Sub-Volume II SME

Proposed SARPs amendment: 		See above.

SME Recommendation to CCB:                 	

The proposed changes makes the SARPs more accurate. The PDR has no impact on interoperability nor safety.

CCB Decision:               	atnp_ccb_chair: SUBMITTED (12/05/98)
					atnp_ccb_chair: ACCEPTED (20/05/98)
					CCB-6 (Utrecht): FORWARDED (25/06/98)
					atnp_ccb_chair : RESOLVED (17/08/98)(1)

(1) CCB agreed that this PDR should be upgraded to RESOLVED status and should appear as part of the first annual amendment to Doc 9705. FORWARDED status is not appropriate since it indicates a PDR which has been referred to an ATNP WG for addition to its work program, i.e. a enhancement or major change to the baseline.