Title: FIS - Reception of a D-START Calling Peer ID with a wrong type PDR Reference: 99010006 Originator Reference: SARPs Document Reference: FIS SARPs, Section 2.4.5.3.12.6 Status: RESOLVED Impact: C (Clarification) PDR Revision Date: 21/01/99 (SUBMITTED -> RESOLVED) PDR Submission Date: 19/01/99 (SG2 - Honolulu) Submitting State/Organization: ATNP/WG3/SG2 Submitting Author Name: Picard, F Submitting Author E-mail Address: Submitting Author Supplemental Contact Information: SARPs Date: IV2.3 (Doc 9705 Ed1) SARPs Language: English Summary of Defect: 1/ The FIS ASE should abort the dialogue when a D-START indication is received with a Calling Peer ID which is not valid for the expected peer originator end system type of the D-START message. 2/ The reception of a D-START indication with a FISDownlinkAPDU in the User Data parameter should be allowed only for the FIS-ground-ASE. 2/ The reception of a D-START confirmation with a FISUplinkAPDU in the User Data parameter should be allowed only for the FIS-air-ASE. Assigned SME: Sub-Volume II SME Proposed SARPs amendment: 1/ Change section 2.4.5.3.12.6 from: Upon receipt of a D-START indication with the parameter containing a FISDownlinkAPDU [FISRequest] APDU and the D-START Indication application service priority parameter has the abstract value "Aeronautical Information Service messages" and the RER Quality of Service Parameter has the abstract value "low", then: To: Upon receipt of a D-START indication with the parameter containing a FISDownlinkAPDU [FISRequest] APDU and the D-START parameter has the abstract value "Aeronautical Information Service messages" and the D-START parameter has the abstract value "low" and the D-START parameter is a valid 24-bit address, then: 2/ Change in section 2.4.5.3.12.6.1 from: the LI module To: the LI ground module 3/ Change in section 2.4.5.3.12.7.1 from: the LI module To: the LI air module 4/ (typo) In section 2.4.5.3.12.6.1 a) change "an" by "a". SME Recommendation to CCB: CCB Decision: atnp_ccb_chair: SUBMITTED (19/01/99) CCB-8a (Honolulu): RESOLVED (21/01/99)