Title: CM - Logon Request/Logon Response Clarification PDR Reference: 99070002 Originator Reference: - SARPs Document Reference: CM SARPs, Sections 2.1.7.1.1.1, 2.1.7.2.2.5 Status: REJECTED Impact: C (Clarification) PDR Revision Date: 28/09/99 (SUBMITTED -> REJECTED) PDR Submission Date: 19/07/99 Submitting State/Organization: ATNP WG3/SG2 Submitting Author Name: Saccone, G Submitting Author E-mail Address: Submitting Author Supplemental: Contact Information: SARPs Date: Document 9705 Edition 1 Amendment 1 (11/99) SARPs Language: English Summary of Defect: There is confusion as to when to put application information in Logon Request and Logon Response APDUs. This PDR suggests adding clarifying notes. Assigned SME: Sub-Volume II SME Proposed SARPs amendment: Add note to 2.1.7.1.1.1: Note. - Some applications such as ADS and FIS are exclusively ground or air initiated, and the Logon Request must reflect that. Other applications such as CPDLC may be classified as either air or ground initiated, or both air and ground initiated (depending on the implementation). If such an application is air only initiated, then the Logon Request will contain only the AEQualifier and version number. If such an application is either ground only initiated OR both air and ground initiated, that application is considered to be ground initiated and the Logon Request will contain the AEQualifier, version number and address of that application. Add note to 2.1.7.2.2.5: Note. - Some applications such as ADS and FIS are exclusively ground or air initiated, and the Logon Response must reflect that. Other applications such as CPDLC may be classified as either air or ground initiated, or both air and ground initiated (depending on the implementation). If such an application is ground only initiated, then the Logon Response will contain only the AEQualifier and version number. If such an application is either air only initiated OR both air and ground initiated, that application is considered to be air initiated and the Logon Reponse will contain the AEQualifier, version number and address of that application. SME Recommendation to CCB: CCB Decision: atnp_ccb_chair: 19/07/99 (SUBMITTED) CCB-10 (Gran Canary): REJECTED Rationale: the proposed text clarifying the use of the fields in the Logon Request and Response is tutorial material and therefore will be inserted in the CAMAL.