Title: DFIS - Error in State Table 2.4.5-9/a

PDR Reference:              		M1110001
Originator Reference:            	
SARPs Document Reference:         	DFIS, Table 2.4.5-9/a
CAMAL Document Reference:		-
P/OICS Document Reference		- 
Status:                       	RESOLVED (proposed to be ADOPTED)
Impact:					C (Clarification)
PDR Revision Date:              	23/01/02 (PROPOSED -> RESOLVED)
						21/01/02 (ACCEPTED -> PROPOSED)
						07/11/01 (SUBMITTED)
Submitting State/Organization:    	OKI
Submitting Author Name:          	Brown, M 
Submitting Author E-mail Address:  	mark667@oki.com
Submitting Author Supplemental 
Contact Information:               	tel. 03-3452-4111 (ext. 43234)
						fax. 03-3798-7040
SARPs Date:                      	Doc 9705 Ed 2
						Doc 9705 Ed 3 (date ??) 
P/OICS Date:				- 
SARPs Language:                  	English

Summary of Defect:

In Table 2.4.5-9/a Ground FIS UC Module State Table (page II-580 of the redline version), in the cell corresponding to Event UC-update-contract rsp (processing) and the UC-G-PENDING state, the table refers to a LI-Send-Normal a [FISAccept-processing] APDU. There is no such APDU defined anywhere else in the SARPs. Is this in fact a positive acknowledgement?

Assigned SME:                    	Sub-Volume II SME

Proposed SARPs amendment: 

The text associated with this cell is correct (section 2.4.5.3.8.4.1). The state table shall be aligned with this section as follows:

1/ Change text in the event colum from:

UC-update-contract rsp (processing)

to:

UC-update-contract rsp (positive ackowledgement)

2/ change text in in the cell corresponding to Event UC-update-contract rsp (processing) and the UC-G-PENDING state from:

LI-Send-Normal [FISAccept-processing] APDU

to:

LI-Send-Normal [FISAccept-positive-ack] APDU

Impact on interoperability: 		No impact, state tables are not normative.

PDR Validation Status:			Paper validation

SME Recommendation to CCB: 		RESOLVED

CCB Decision:                    	atnp_ccb_chair (07/11/01): SUBMITTED